Tuesday 18 August 2009

If You Don't Like This, You're All A Bunch Of Basterds!



I love Quentin Tarantino movies. Mostly. Resevoir Dogs is his most grounded and intense work which is why I still think it's his best. Pulp Fiction brought some his best characters and dialogue kicking and screaming onto the silver screen. The two KIll Bills are a funny and thrilling delight, as are his scripts for True Romance and From Dusk Till Dawn. Death Proof was evidence of his stunning ability to deconstruct a movie genre and create something unique from its ashes. Only Jackie Brown, a movie I like but don't adore, fails to excite me.

For Inglourious Basterds Tarantino plays with the World War II mission movie, and in the process, has less action than any other behind-enemy-lines movie in memory. But, since this is motor-mouth Quentin were talking about, thats quite alright thank you. QT structures the movie into 5 acts, gradually introducing his characters, situations, motivations and objectives. Each act contains long, talky scenes (in English, French German and Italian) that consisely communicate the plot...much like a play. Each scene is expertly crafted to build suspence, while littering proceeding with memorable occurances and dialogue, which the cast interprete with style.

Melanie Laurent (a younger and french Uma Thurman clone) get the main storyline, as the vengeful Shosanna, and also the least dialogue of the main ensemble. Hers is a thoughtful, considered performance. Everybody elsae is living in Quentin's world and act accordingly. Pitt is charming and hilarious as the Basterds leader, Aldo Raine, all swagger and broad southern accent (his attempt to speak Italian nearly had me in tears). It's a broad characature but it fits in perfectly to the enhanced reality of QT's WWII. He's matched in a truly original turn by Christophe Waltz as the antagonist of the piece, Col. Hans Landa. It's both chilling, daft, animated and brutal...and Waltz makes it all seem grounded and part of the same complex character (do I hear Oscar buzz?) He comes across like a young Jerome Krabbe, times ten! Michael Fassbender as stiff, upper-class officer Archie Hicox is the other standout, coming across like a 40's movie star reincarnated...David Niven reborn if you like.

Thematically there's a lot going on in Basterds, and I suspect it will take multiple viewings (like Death Proof) to uncover the subtext. But it's obvious from the outset this is a celebration of the power of cinema; about it's power as a propaganda tool, to bring people together and it's explosive power to change (this happens almost literally as the cinema screen explodes with Shosanna's vengeful projection laughing manically). It's like a post-modern fairytale; extemely aware of it's own existence as a movie. It starts of with a "Once upon a time" chapter heading and even has a cinderella slipper moment.

There's also a lot going on about the need for a reputation amongst others. German sniper Zoller is a war hgero reveling in his new found status as movie star. The Basterds themselves actively seek to spread infamy throughout German ranks. Hammersmark wants to maintain her movie star image while Hicox is obviously proud of his ex-movie critic career, boasting at one point of his being in a famous movie. Landa relishes and promotes his Jew Hunter nickname as it stikes fear into his prey while, initially, Shosanna is the only player who seeks anonimity as she tries to hide her Jewish heritage. It's only at the climax as she deliberately projects her home-movie onto the cinema screen that she too wishes it to be known that she is responsible.

Basterds stands as QT's best photographed and designed movie to date. It's a testament to the structure and pacing of the movie that, after two and a half hours, you want to see more...but that happens with most QT movies. It's only in the third act, as an adult Shosanna is reintroduced that the pace slackens...but it's necessary and not for long as Waltz arrives to spice things up. I have a feeling that this may not go down too well in the States with it's revisionist history, talky chapers and heavy emphasis on subtitles. However, the international feel may boost it's overseas chances at the box office, especially in Europe, where the respect to that area's languages might pay off. Let's hope it does 'cause I'd like to see the half written prequel to this glourious baby.

2 comments:

Nick aka Puppet Angel said...

What a bunch of basterds!

I loved this. Every fantastic moment of it. IMHO 'Basterds' is the best thing QT has done since Pulp Fiction.

This is a gruesome WW2 fairytale. Historical accuracy be damned. It's more of a 'what if...?' Or a 'wouldn't it have been cool if...?' And not a 'what happened was...' movie.

I loved the inventive cinematic style on show here. Basterds is gorgeously photgraphed and designed employing everything from captions, insertion of old film clips, narration, flashbacks and gloriously shot imagery - especially around the beautiful Melanie Laurent as Shosanna and her lovely old style cinema. Music is an important factor as it is in any Tarantino film. And here QT uses music from all sorts of old movies and even a cool David Bowie song at one point to wonderful effect. The performances are all very good with two being great: Christoph Waltz as the Nazi Jew hunter Col. Landa and the afore mentioned Laurent. Waltz is charming and brutal while Laurent is lovely and calmly compelling. Of the Basterds, Pitt is thuggish and funny and Til Schweiger as ex-German soldier turned Basterd Nazi killer is quietly psychotic. But the film is mostly Shosanna's story. She is the main protagonist and the one we feel for. There is not much action in the film. But when it comes it is quick, brutal and memorable. As with all QT films the beauty is mostly in the writing. And in Inglorious Basterds he's written his best stuff in years.

I'd love to see more of these basterds.

sickboy said...

Interesting. I loved this as I love QTs dialogue and style and bias takes over. Be it his directed movies or his scripts. True Romance is in my top 10.

It's funny that it has got some muted reviews, but then It has seemed in vogue to Knock QT since Pulp Fiction - tough to ever match that though - A lot of how Jackie Brown is his best now because he didn't write it. Typical 'what can I write' reviewing techniques.

I think I too will watch this many times again. It was hard going as I was a bit knackered watching the late show and there is a lot of talking and loads of subtitles in this. I missed a lot through purely concentrating on staying awake.

Got laugh at how the fact the Trailer really doesn't reflect the movie though. Had to be some disapointed patrons.

He is a clever man but I suppose he inspired so many that his work is not as unique anymore.